The WattPlan Podcast · Episode 7 · 10 min
How often should you take a recovery week?
Read the transcript
James. You're listening to the WattPlan Podcast, and I'm James. Day to day it's family, work, building WattPlan and chasing the odd podium, and somewhere in the gaps I read a slightly silly amount of sports science. This week, the week everyone skips. Three weeks on and one off is practically gospel, so is it actually backed by anything, and how much should you really cut? Lyra, who's an AI and our research voice, has been through the trials, and every study is linked in the show notes.
Lyra. Ha, the week everyone skips and then wonders why the next block feels flat. Straight answer. Every third or fourth week is the convention, and it comes from coaching tradition more than trials. On how much to cut, WattPlan's recovery week takes the hours down by about a third, keeps at least two full rest days, and keeps every ride easy.
James. Hang on. Three on, one off, and you're telling me nobody's tested it?
Lyra. Not head to head. We looked for a randomised trial comparing two hard weeks and one easy with three and one, in cyclists or any endurance sport, and found none. So the spacing is a sensible habit, not a proven number. What the trials do show is how quickly hard training can turn into lost performance.
James. Go on then. How quickly?
Lyra. Faster than most riders would guess. The clearest study is Shona Halson, Asker Jeukendrup and colleagues, from 2002, in the Journal of Applied Physiology. Eight endurance cyclists did two weeks of normal training, two weeks of intensified training, then two weeks of recovery. After the hard fortnight, their simulated time trial went from 59.4 minutes to 65.3. Maximal power dropped from 338 watts to 319. [2]
James. Six minutes slower. That's enormous.
Lyra. It is, and maximal heart rate fell by 9.3 percent as well. The authors' conclusion is the line to remember. Overreaching can show up after as little as seven days of intensified training with too little recovery.
James. Overreaching. Define that for me, because I think people use it to mean just a bit tired.
Lyra. Right, so functional overreaching is a short-term fall in performance that's followed by improvement once you've recovered. Non-functional overreaching is what follows when training and recovery stay out of balance. A recovery week is the scheduled part of that recovery, so you plan it before sessions start failing, not after.
James. But surely some overreaching is the point? Dig deep in the block, then bounce back higher. That's the whole idea.
Lyra. That's exactly what the third study tested, and the answer isn't what the dig-deep crowd wants. Aubry and colleagues, 2014, in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Thirty-three trained male triathletes. Twenty-three did three weeks of overload, ten trained normally, then everyone had a four week taper. After the overload, eleven were functionally overreached, performance down with high fatigue. The other twelve were just tired, with no drop in performance. [3]
James. And who came out on top?
Lyra. The tired but not overreached group. They reached the highest peak through the taper, above both the overreached group and the ones who'd trained normally. So pushing on until performance actually fell bought nothing extra. Train hard enough to be tired, then unload before the sessions start failing.
James. Okay, so that's when. Now how much do I actually cut? Half? A quarter? Everything?
Lyra. The nearest guide is a 2007 meta-analysis in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise by Laurent Bosquet and colleagues. It pooled 27 studies of tapers in competitive sport and found the biggest benefit when training volume came down by 41 to 60 percent, while intensity and how often they trained stayed the same. Two weeks was the best length. [1]
James. But a taper's before a race. That's not the same as an easy week in the middle of a block, is it?
Lyra. You're right, and that's the catch. Bosquet looked at tapers before competition, and we found no pooled analysis of mid-block recovery weeks. So it's the nearest guide, not a direct answer. What it does back is riding less rather than stopping, and that's the part a recovery week keeps.
James. So if I'm hearing you right, I don't stop riding. I just ride less of it. How much less, in practice?
Lyra. For a rider doing eight hours in a loading week, WattPlan's recovery week comes out at about five hours. Each ride is about a third shorter, at least two days are full rest, and all of it is easy. That's a smaller cut than the tapers in that analysis, because it's a pause in the middle of a block, not the run in to a race. That's how WattPlan plans it.
James. And what about the chart? Because my Fitness line drops and I panic.
Lyra. Ha, the classic. WattPlan's Fitness is a 42 day weighted average of your daily Load, and Fatigue covers seven days. So a lighter week pulls Fitness down a little and Fatigue much further, which lifts Form. That's arithmetic on the Load you rode. How your next hard session goes tells you far more about your legs than the line does.
James. Love it. Let's split it out by who's listening. If you're new to this, what does a recovery week look like?
Lyra. If you're new to structured training, keep it simple. After three weeks of steady riding, make the fourth one lighter. Shorter rides, at least two rest days, and all of it at an easy, chatty pace. Then judge it by how the following week feels, not by whether the easy week felt productive.
James. And if you train with power or heart rate?
Lyra. Then let the plan place it. WattPlan puts a recovery week every fourth week of each training phase, so in a long plan you can see four or five loading weeks in a row where one phase runs into the next. Expect the hours down about a third and no hard session. And if sessions start failing, or a heavy week at work lands on top of training, ask the Coach to cut the week back rather than pushing on.
James. And if you race, or you're building towards a target event?
Lyra. If you race, the Aubry result matters most. Hard blocks are fine, but the best peak came from being tired, not from being overreached. So don't push a block on until your power drops. And the week before a taper doesn't need its own recovery week, because the taper is the unload.
James. How does WattPlan actually build one, then?
Lyra. Every fourth week of a training phase is a recovery week. Its Load is set from the Fitness you carry into it, so Fitness dips only a little, and the dip scales with how fit you are. No hard sessions, and every ride, the long one included, is about a third shorter than usual. At least two days are full rest. A hard club ride on your schedule stays in, with advice to sit in, and an event you've added keeps its full length.
James. And what can't the studies tell us here?
Lyra. Quite a lot. No trial has tested how often a recovery week should come, or how deep it should be, in amateur cyclists. Bosquet's numbers come from tapers, Halson had eight riders, and Aubry's were male triathletes. Most people across these studies were men. And older riders are often told to take a lighter week more often, but we found no cycling trial that tested it.
James. Right. So what's the homework this week?
Lyra. Three things. One, find your next recovery week in the plan, and don't skip it to chase Fitness. Two, when it comes, ride it as written, hours down about a third, at least two rest days, every ride shorter. Three, keep the whole week easy, then judge it by your first hard session after it, not by the Form line.
James. Okay, in my words. Three hard weeks, then a third off the hours, two rest days, all of it easy, and stop staring at the Form line. And if the block's going badly, ask the Coach to cut the week back.
Lyra. That's it. In a hard block, tired is the goal and overreached isn't. The recovery week is where you plan the recovery that tired depends on.
Lyra. The full article and every study we mentioned are on the WattPlan blog, linked in the show notes.
James. And if you want a plan that's built around the time you've actually got, that's what WattPlan does. Thanks for listening.
Voices produced with ElevenLabs. James's voice is a clone of his own, Lyra is an AI voice, and James reviews every script before it is published.
A recovery week in cycling is a planned lighter week after two or three harder ones. No trial has compared a 3:1 pattern with 2:1 in cyclists. The closest pooled evidence, a 2007 meta-analysis of 27 taper studies, found the best results when volume fell by 41 to 60% while intensity and how often you rode stayed the same.
How often should you take a recovery week?
Every third or fourth week is the convention in most cycling plans, and it rests on coaching tradition more than trial data. We looked for a randomised trial comparing two loading weeks and one easy week with three and one, in cyclists or any endurance sport, and found none.
The trials do show how quickly hard training turns into lost performance. Shona Halson, Asker Jeukendrup and colleagues put eight endurance cyclists through two weeks each of normal, intensified and recovery training. After the intensified training their simulated time trial took 65.3 minutes instead of 59.4, maximal power fell from 338 to 319 W and maximal heart rate dropped 9.3%. The authors concluded that overreaching can appear after as little as 7 days of intensified training with too little recovery.
So the right spacing depends on how hard the loading weeks are. Our view at WattPlan is that three loading weeks and one lighter week is a sensible default for a steady build, and that a big block, a training camp or a heavy fortnight at work earns the lighter week sooner.
What the studies changed and found
| Study | Who | What changed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bosquet 2007, meta-analysis | 27 taper studies | Volume, intensity, frequency and length of the taper | Best with volume cut 41 to 60%, intensity and frequency held, over 2 weeks |
| Halson 2002 | 8 endurance cyclists | 2 weeks of intensified training, then 2 weeks of recovery | Time trial 59.4 to 65.3 min, maximal power 338 to 319 W |
| Aubry 2014 | 33 trained male triathletes | 3 weeks of overload, then a 4 week taper | 11 of the 23 overloaded were overreached, and they peaked lower than those who were only tired |
| Almquist 2022 | 30 trained cyclists | 12 weeks with every fourth week lighter, hard sessions arranged two ways | 5 and 40 min power up about 9% and 8% in both groups |
| Coleman 2024 | 39 trained lifters | One week off at the midpoint of 9 weeks | Same muscle size, less lower-body strength gain than training straight through |
How much should you cut in a recovery week?
Bosquet's meta-analysis looked at tapers before competition, not the easy week in the middle of a block, and we found no pooled analysis of mid-block recovery weeks, so it is the nearest guide to how far to unload. Cutting volume by 41 to 60% had the largest effect (an effect size of 0.72), keeping intensity and session frequency unchanged both helped, and two weeks was the best length. Applied to a recovery week, that points to shorter rides on the same days with a little intensity left in. Our taper guide covers the race version.
A full week off behaves differently. In Coleman's trial, 39 trained lifters either kept training or stopped for one week halfway through a 9 week programme. Muscle size and muscular endurance ended up the same, but the group that kept going gained more lower-body strength. That was resistance training, not riding, so read it as a hint that stopping costs more than easing off.
For a rider who does 8 hours in a loading week, a cut of about half means 4 to 5 hours, with the same number of rides and each one shorter. Keep a few minutes near threshold or VO2max power in one ride, and ride the rest easy.
Is overreaching in a hard block a good thing?
Aubry and colleagues gave 23 of 33 trained male triathletes three weeks of overload before a four week taper, while the other 10 trained normally. After the overload, 11 had a drop in performance with high fatigue, which is functional overreaching, and 12 were tired with no drop in performance. Through the taper the tired but not overreached group reached the highest peak, above both the overreached group and the controls. Pushing on until performance fell bought nothing extra.
The 2013 joint consensus of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine defines functional overreaching as a short-term fall in performance that is followed by improvement once the rider recovers. Non-functional overreaching is what follows when training and recovery stay out of balance. A recovery week is the scheduled part of that recovery, so plan it before sessions start failing.
Do recovery weeks cost you fitness?
On the chart, a little. WattPlan's Fitness is a 42-day weighted average of your daily Load and Fatigue covers 7 days, so a lighter week pulls Fitness down slightly and Fatigue much further, which lifts Form. That is arithmetic on the Load you rode. A rising Form line says your recent riding was lighter, and how your next hard session goes tells you more about your legs. There is more on reading the chart in Fitness, Fatigue and Form explained.
The Almquist trial offers some reassurance. Thirty trained cyclists started 12 weeks in three blocks of four, with the fourth week of every block lighter. Of the 26 who completed it and were analysed, both groups raised their 5 minute and 40 minute time trial power by about 9% and 8%. The trial wasn't testing the recovery weeks themselves, so it shows that a 3:1 structure leaves room for real gains, not that it beats every other spacing.
How WattPlan plans a recovery week
Every fourth week of a training phase is a recovery week. Its Load is set from the Fitness you carry into it, so Fitness dips only a little, and the dip scales with how fit you are, so a newer rider doesn't give back a month of progress in one easy week. That week has no hard sessions and no long ride, and each ride the plan prescribes is shorter than your usual time for that day. Your own commitments stay as they are. A hard club ride on your schedule stays in, with advice to sit in, and a race or event you've added keeps its full length and effort, with the rest of that week kept easy.
There's no recovery week straight before a taper, because the taper is the unload, and a plan without an event ends on a consolidation week that holds the Load steady instead of easing off. The plan's recovery week drops intensity where the taper research kept a little. If a week of only easy riding leaves you flat, ask the Coach to swap one ride for a short threshold session. If a block is going badly before the scheduled week, ask the Coach to reduce the week's volume or turn the next few days into a recovery block, and it changes the plan for you.
What to do in your next block
- Count your loading weeks. After three in a row at or above your usual Load, make the next one lighter.
- Cut the hours by about half, keep the same riding days and shorten each ride.
- Keep a few minutes near threshold in one ride so the week isn't only easy riding.
- Take the lighter week sooner when sessions start failing or a hard week at work lands on top of training.
- Judge the week by your first hard session after it, not by the Form line.
What we don't know yet
No trial has tested how often a recovery week should come, or how deep it should be, in amateur cyclists. Bosquet's numbers come from tapers before competition, Halson's study had eight riders, Aubry's were male triathletes and Coleman's were lifters. Every rider in Almquist's trial had the lighter fourth week, so nothing in it isolates that week's effect. Most participants across these studies were men. Older riders are often told to take a lighter week more often, and we found no cycling trial that tested it. For how these weeks fit into a season, see periodisation for cyclists.
Sources
- Effects of tapering on performance: a meta-analysis, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
- Time course of performance changes and fatigue markers during intensified training in trained cyclists, Journal of Applied Physiology
- Functional overreaching: the key to peak performance during the taper?, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
- No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists, Frontiers in Physiology
- Gaining more from doing less? The effects of a one-week deload period during supervised resistance training on muscular adaptations, PeerJ
- Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
