The WattPlan Podcast · Episode 3 · 10 min
How many hours a week do you really need?
Read the transcript
James. Hello, and welcome to the WattPlan Podcast. I'm James. I fit my riding in around family, work and building WattPlan, I've stood on the odd podium, and my reading pile is mostly sports science nobody asked me to read. This week, the question every rider with a job ends up asking. How many hours a week do you actually need to train to get faster? Joining me is Lyra, an AI who does our research, and every study we mention is linked in the show notes.
Lyra. Ha, the big one. Straight answer, about three hours a week is enough for most riders to get fitter. Four to six hours covers a first 100 kilometre sportive. And if life gets in the way, a couple of rides a week with some intensity kept in will hold a lot of the fitness you've already got. The hours set the ceiling, and where you start sets how fast you get there.
James. Three hours. That sounds suspiciously low. Where does that come from?
Lyra. We looked at three studies for this episode, and this is the one I'd lead with. Montero and Lundby, in The Journal of Physiology in 2017. They split 78 healthy adults into five groups doing one, two, three, four or five 60 minute sessions a week, for six weeks, with everything else identical. Maximal power went up in the groups doing two to five sessions, but not in the one session group. [1]
James. So one hour a week does basically nothing?
Lyra. For most people in that trial, nothing measurable. 69 percent of the one session group didn't respond. Then it drops, 40 percent at two sessions, 29 at three, and nobody at all at four or five. And here's my favourite bit. The non-responders then did another six weeks with two extra sessions a week, and every single one of them improved.
James. Oh, that's brilliant. So there's no such thing as a non-responder, just someone who hasn't done enough yet.
Lyra. That's the paper's title, more or less. And the gains tracked haemoglobin mass, the blood's capacity to carry oxygen. The engine was responding all along. It just needed a bigger dose.
James. But surely I can cheat this. Everyone says intervals give you more for less. Can't I just do short, brutal sessions and skip the hours?
Lyra. You can, if you're starting from nothing, and the second study is the striking one. Gillen, Gibala and colleagues, PLOS ONE, 2016. Sedentary men trained three times a week for twelve weeks. One group did three 20 second all out sprints, around 500 watts, inside a ten minute session. The other rode 45 minutes steady inside a 50 minute session. Peak oxygen uptake rose 19 percent in both groups. [2]
James. Hang on. Ten minutes against fifty, and the same result?
Lyra. The same rise in that measure, from five times less exercise. But look at who it was. Sedentary men, nine in one group and ten in the other. That's people going from nothing to something. It tells you hard work is a strong signal. It doesn't tell you a trained rider can get round a 100 mile sportive on ten minute sessions.
James. Fair. Nobody's finishing a sportive on sixty seconds of sprinting.
Lyra. No. A sportive needs a long ride, and a long ride needs time. That's where the hours really earn their keep.
James. Okay, so what about five hours? That's where a lot of people with jobs actually land.
Lyra. For a first 100 kilometre sportive and steady improvement, five hours works. Spread over four days, it gives you two hard rides and a two hour long ride most weeks, with every fourth week eased off, and the long ride is the one a sportive rider can't do without. Our view at WattPlan is that the long ride and your hard sessions are the ones to protect. Two hard ones from four days and four hours a week, one below that.
James. But five hours won't make me fly, will it? There must be a ceiling.
Lyra. There is, and it's worth being honest about. Fitness is a 42 day weighted average of your daily Load, and Load is mostly time. In WattPlan's plan generator, five hours a week levels off at a Fitness of about 36. Seven and a half hours, about 52. Ten hours, about 68. Roughly, double the hours and you double the Fitness a week can carry.
James. So what happens when I hit that ceiling? Does the plan just pile on more intervals?
Lyra. No. It makes each session a bit harder through the block, and the plan page tells you your hours are capping it, in a sentence like five hours a week hold your Fitness around 36. Adding a training day or lengthening the long ride is what raises it. It never adds a third hard day to chase Load.
James. And for a first 100 miles?
Lyra. Plan on six to nine hours, with most of the extra going into the weekend ride. WattPlan opens the long ride at what your Fitness can carry, then grows it with the rest of your week, up to the time you've booked.
James. Right, here's the one I really care about. Busy month, family stuff, everything goes sideways. How little can I do without losing it all?
Lyra. Less than you'd fear, as long as you keep the intensity. The third study is a 2021 review by Spiering, Mujika and colleagues in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. In general populations, endurance held for up to 15 weeks with as few as two sessions a week, or with sessions cut to as little as 13 to 26 minutes, as long as exercise heart rate stayed the same. [4]
James. So in a bad fortnight I keep some intensity in, rather than just easy spins?
Lyra. Yes, intensity is the thing you protect. If you tell WattPlan you've only got two short slots, it keeps one hard session and makes the other easy, and anything under 45 minutes stays easy, so give the hard one 45 minutes if you can. And the limit is worth saying out loud. They found too little data to give specific numbers for trained competitors. So it's a strong pointer for most of us, not a rule for someone at the sharp end.
James. Love it. Let's split it by who's listening. If you're new to this, where do you start?
Lyra. If you're new to structured training, three to four hours over three days is plenty. One ride with some hard work in it, the rest easy, and a longer ride at the weekend. WattPlan never gives a beginner more than one hard ride a week, whatever their hours. Build the habit first, and the Fitness follows.
James. And if you train with power or heart rate?
Lyra. Then watch the shape of the week more than the total. With three riding days, make one ride hard. With four or more days and at least four hours, make two hard, each followed by an easy day. And keep an eye on your Fitness line. If it flattens, add a day or lengthen the long ride before you reach for more intensity.
James. And if you race, or you're chasing a big hilly sportive?
Lyra. If you race, ten or more hours is where the post's plans sit, with two hard days, a three hour Saturday and a two hour Sunday. But even then, the extra hours mostly go into easy riding and the long ride, not a third interval day. And the plan won't hand you all ten from day one. It opens at what your starting Fitness can carry and builds towards your booked hours.
James. Really? Even if I've told it I've got ten hours?
Lyra. Even then. A rider starting at a Fitness of 20 opens on about six and a half hours and builds up. If you've been riding more than that lately, you tell it, and set your starting Fitness higher.
James. So where does all this run out? What can't the trials tell me?
Lyra. Quite a lot. Most of this evidence comes from untrained or recreational adults over six to twelve weeks, measured in a lab, not on a sportive. Montero had 78 people across five groups, and the sprint study had ten or fewer per arm. No trial has compared, say, five against eight hours a week in trained amateur cyclists over a season. So the hour bands combine the trials with what the plan generator does, and the realistic aims are coaching judgement.
James. Right, homework. What do I do this week?
Lyra. Three things. One, count the hours you can ride every week, not the hours of a good week, and build from the smaller number. Two, pick your long ride and protect it. Three, if a busy fortnight hits, change your days in the app and ride the hard session it keeps, rather than stopping altogether.
James. Okay, in my words. Plan for my worst normal week, guard the long ride, and when life kicks off, keep the one hard ride rather than stopping altogether.
Lyra. That's it, you've got it. And the one line to keep, three hours gets most riders fitter, and the hours you can repeat every week beat the hours you hope for.
Lyra. The full article and every study we mentioned are on the WattPlan blog, linked in the show notes.
James. And if you want a plan that's built around the time you've actually got, that's what WattPlan does. Thanks for listening.
Voices produced with ElevenLabs. James's voice is a clone of his own, Lyra is an AI voice, and James reviews every script before it is published.
About three hours of cycling a week is enough for most riders to get fitter, and four to six hours covers a first 100 km sportive. In a 2017 trial by Montero and Lundby, 69% of adults training one hour a week didn't measurably improve in six weeks, and everyone training four or five hours did.
What can each number of hours a week support?
The hours set the ceiling, and your starting point sets how fast you reach it. The table shows what WattPlan's plan generator builds for a rider who starts at a Fitness of 20 and asks for a 12 week plan with no event, at the default ramp. Fitness is a 42-day weighted average of daily Load, so it rises only as fast as the riding does.
| Weekly hours | Example week | Hard rides a week | First week, from a Fitness of 20 | Fitness after 12 weeks | Realistic aim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 to 4 | Tue 60 min, Thu 60 min, Sat 90 min | 1 | 3.5 h | 22 | Get fitter from a low base, or hold fitness through a busy spell |
| 5 to 6 | Tue 60 min, Thu 60 min, Sat 2 h, Sun 60 min | 2 | 5 h | 33 | A first 100 km sportive |
| 7 to 9 | Tue 75 min, Wed 60 min, Thu 75 min, Sat 2 h 30, Sun 90 min | 2 | 6 h | 46 | A first 100 mile sportive, or a hilly 100 km ridden harder |
| 10 or more | Tue 90 min, Wed 60 min, Thu 90 min, Fri 60 min, Sat 3 h, Sun 2 h | 2 | 6.4 h | 55 | Long hilly sportives and club racing |
Each row levels off at a different Fitness. In the generator, 3.5 hours a week holds Fitness around 24, 5 hours around 36, 7.5 hours around 52 and 10 hours around 68, with every fourth week of each phase cut to about 60% of the time. Doubling the hours roughly doubles the Fitness a week can carry, because Fitness is built from Load and Load is mostly time.
What are the minimum training hours for cycling?
About three hours a week for most people, and less if some of it is very hard. Montero and Lundby split 78 healthy adults into five groups doing one to five 60 minute endurance sessions a week, with the same six week programme otherwise. Maximal power rose in the groups doing two to five sessions but not in the one-session group. The share who didn't respond, meaning their change was within the ±3.96% measurement error, fell from 69% at one session to 40% at two, 29% at three and none at four or five. When the non-responders added two sessions a week for another six weeks, every one of them improved, and the gains tracked increases in haemoglobin mass.
Very short, very hard training works too, for people starting from nothing. Gillen, Gibala and colleagues trained sedentary men three times a week for 12 weeks in 2016. One group did three 20 second all-out sprints of about 500 W inside a 10 minute session, and the other rode 45 minutes at about 70% of maximum heart rate inside a 50 minute session. Peak oxygen uptake rose 19% in both groups, from a weekly time commitment of 30 minutes in one and 150 minutes in the other. The groups were only nine and ten men.
Across 28 trials and 723 healthy adults aged 18 to 45, Milanović and colleagues found in 2015 that endurance training raised VO2max by 4.9 ml/kg/min against no training (95% confidence limits ±1.4) and interval training by 5.5 ml/kg/min (±1.2). Intervals came out about 1.2 ml/kg/min ahead of endurance training (±0.9), a small edge.
Is 5 hours a week enough?
For a first 100 km sportive and for steady improvement, yes. Spread over four days, five hours lets the plan give two hard rides and a two hour long ride every week, and the long ride is the one a sportive rider can't do without. Our view at WattPlan is that time-crunched cycling training should spend the scarce hours on two hard sessions and one long ride, and cut the easy filler rides first when a week gets short.
Five hours won't carry a high Fitness. The generator levels a five hour week off at about 36, and once the hours stop rising it makes each session harder through the block instead. When your hours cap what the plan can build, the plan page says so in a sentence such as "5 hours a week hold your Fitness around 36", and tells you that adding a training day or lengthening the long ride is what raises it. It never adds a third hard day to chase Load, and the most Load it will plan for a week is 56 per hour of riding.
How many hours a week to train for a sportive?
Plan on four to six hours for a first 100 km and six to nine for a first 100 miles, with most of the extra going into the weekend ride. Trained road cyclists in research studies ride a little more. A 2023 systematic review by Galán-Rioja, Seiler and colleagues found the seven qualifying periodisation studies ran at 7.5 to 11.7 hours a week, and none of the models beat the others over 8 to 12 weeks. Our first sportive plan lays out the 12 weeks, and the beginner plan covers the 3.5 hour week in detail.
How little training keeps the fitness you have?
Two sessions a week, if the intensity stays. Spiering, Mujika and colleagues reviewed the maintenance research in 2021 and found that in general populations endurance held for up to 15 weeks with as few as two sessions a week, or with session volume cut by 33 to 66%, as low as 13 to 26 minutes, as long as exercise heart rate stayed the same. They found too little data to give trained competitors specific numbers.
A trial in elite cyclists points the same way. Christensen and colleagues gave 18 male elite cyclists, average VO2max 71 ml/kg/min, three interval sessions a week for seven weeks in season. One group cut its moderate riding by about a third, roughly five hours a week, and the other kept it. A time trial of about 20 minutes improved 3% in the reduced group and 2%, not statistically significant, in the other, and a time trial ridden after a two hour preload didn't improve significantly. Our post on how quickly you lose cycling fitness covers what a full break costs.
How WattPlan builds a week from your hours
You set the days you can ride and the minutes on each, and the plan is built inside them. A week with fewer than four riding days or under four hours gets one hard ride, and a beginner gets one whatever their hours, otherwise it gets two. The long ride goes on the day you mark for it, or on your longest day if you leave it unmarked.
The plan doesn't fill every booked minute from day one. It opens at the volume your starting Fitness supports, so in the 10 hour example above, a rider at a Fitness of 20 starts on about 6.4 hours and builds towards ten. If you told onboarding how much you have been riding lately, it opens near that and adds about 10% a week. When it opens below your booked hours it says why, and if you are already riding more, you set your starting Fitness higher.
What to do with the hours you have
- Count the hours you can ride every week, not the hours of a good week. Build from the smaller number.
- Protect one long ride, and grow it by no more than about 15 minutes a week towards your event.
- With three riding days make one ride hard, and with four or more make two hard, each followed by an easy day.
- When a busy fortnight hits, keep two short sessions at full intensity rather than four easy ones.
- If your Fitness levels off, add a day or lengthen the long ride before you add intensity.
What the trials can't tell you
Most of this evidence comes from untrained or recreational adults over 6 to 12 weeks. Montero and Lundby's groups held about 15 people each, the sprint study ten or fewer per arm, and both measured fitness in a laboratory, not on a sportive. The elite trial studied 18 men for seven weeks. No trial has compared, say, 5 against 8 hours a week in trained amateur cyclists over a season, so the bands above combine the trials with what the plan generator does, and the realistic aims are coaching judgement.
Sources
- Refuting the myth of non-response to exercise training: 'non-responders' do respond to higher dose of training, The Journal of Physiology
- Twelve Weeks of Sprint Interval Training Improves Indices of Cardiometabolic Health Similar to Traditional Endurance Training despite a Five-Fold Lower Exercise Volume and Time Commitment, PLOS ONE
- Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials, Sports Medicine
- Maintaining Physical Performance: The Minimal Dose of Exercise Needed to Preserve Endurance and Strength Over Time, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Training Periodization, Intensity Distribution, and Volume in Trained Cyclists: A Systematic Review, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Importance of training volume during intensified training in elite cyclists: Maintained vs. reduced volume at moderate intensity, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
